An invocation will be delivered on January 20th in Washington, D.C. Having spent two years in 9:00 a.m. Greek and Latin class, I know that "invocation" derives from the Latin voco, vocare which means to "call, name; to summon; to call upon, invoke (the gods) . . ."Mainstream LGBT rights groups shared my feeling of a hand moving swiftly across my face as we heard the news of Barack Obama's choice of evangelical mega-church leader Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation. The Human Rights Campaign circulated a petition which even my parents signed. Pundits decried the announcement and questioned Obama's commitment to equal rights.
I share all of these feelings and concerns. The decision the Obama team made was Wrong. It is not a matter of including differing viewpoints. There must be boundary lines drawn within which we can disagree. We may have different approaches to health care or cleaning up the environment but there must be a shared foundation that all people deserve equal treatment and all love should be honored, respected and nourished.
That much seems relatively undisputed among those who value LGBT Americans and believe that marriage equality is a worthwhile goal.
What hasn't yet received enough attention is the discussion of how we ought to respond. I'm not sure upon whose god Rick Warren will call, but I view the invocation as a chance for our community to ask upon whom we are calling.
Perhaps our first step was to express our disappointment and hurt. But now we must look toward the long future ahead of us. Our future is beyond two terms of a non-hostile presidential administration. Living life without full acceptance and legal protection by our society can be excruciating. And, as much as I wish President Obama would change this, he won't and he can't because presidents don't hand equality to those who need it.
The best thing leaders like Harvey Milk and Barack Obama do for us is call upon the strength, love, and hope that is already within US. To use another latin reference, the word education comes from "e" and "duco" which translates literally to "lead out of". I remember my latin professor using his arms to dramatize how he could pull out the knowledge from my brain rather than stuffing it in. It's the same with Obama. We supported him because he helped us believe in OURSELVES not because we thought he would do a whole lot for us gays.
If we think we can simply call on him to save us, we will be disappointed everyday. If we take-in his message of inspiration (to breathe life in), we can keep our HOPE alive and remember that the power to change others' hearts is in OUR hands. We must stay active, loving, and engaged and not be deflated because by this blow. We have a long journey ahead of us.
Of all the discussion of the Warren invocation, the message that most resonated in my heart was by the illustrious Melissa Etheridge who reminded us that
"we have the capability to create change, awesome change in this world, but before we change minds we must change hearts." Even further, she challenges us to "in our anger, as we consider marches and boycotts, perhaps we can consider stretching out our hands."As someone who has been on the Warren side of the fence, I believe evangelical christians think they have the market cornered on loving those with whom they disagree. I witness the queer community's ability everyday to maintain relationships with those who fear or misunderstand us and to love one another even at great personal risk.
I'm not sure I believe that intentional outreach to evangelicals is a worthwhile strategy. But perhaps continuing to share, with those already in our lives who don't understand us, our stories and our vision for a community that celebrates loving commitment will help us move forward one step at a time.
Please share any ideas for how we can constructively do this.




